I am a political economist studying innovation, industry, and international security. Since September 2001, I have been advising industries and ministries on their issues of strategy, planning, and policy. My work aims to inform investors, industrialists, technologists, and policy-makers on how to effect, economically, a secure future.

Recent Articles

« Where's the defense reform movement now? Three reasons today's arguments for simplicity are falling short | Main | Difficult choices in reconnaissance and close air support, made more difficult »

09 December 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

What about some parachuting Tankettes?
German Army has an armoured vehicle category that fits inside CH-53: The Wiesel Armoured Weapons Carrier.

Weight of Wiesel 1 is about 3 tonnes and length less than 4 m (12 ft). Wiesel 1 is equipped with TOW missiles or 20 mm cannon (AP/HE).

The slightly bigger Wiesel 2 weights less than 5 tonnes. Wiesel 2 is in service as light air defense system (Stinger/IRIS-T) and 120 mm armoured mortar system (gunner protected).

Tracked driving pleasure up to 50 mph: http://youtu.be/D4OTszqbWtQ
(Power to weight ratio just like a main battle tank)

Tank commander-gunner in following video is also paratrooper: http://youtu.be/KNkcHAzAbeY


MHalblaub: The Wiesel may be called a tankette, but it has no airdrop capability.

If they are considering the ASCOD or CV90, they might as well look at a 105mm armed Bradley. They are all in roughly the same weight class (too big for a C130), and we wouldn't have to introduce a new chassis.

The Army has airdropped a Stryker MGS representative load, IIRC. So it could be an off-the-shelf option that fits within existing procurements.

Gentlemen: I take the point about the Wiesel, but the US Army's notion for this concept is much larger. The Army wants a big gun on the vehicle. It's also reasonable to speculate about what BAE Systems in the US might want to propose with a Bradley, but I've not seen anything so far.

The comments to this entry are closed.


  • Read only the first few pages. The clarity and eloquence of them is highly unusual. Extremely un-boring. Everything that one does not need to know seems to have been removed before publication.
    — Attorney, politician, academic, and strategist
  • I'm continually amazed and impressed with what appears to me to be some magical ability you have to synthesize a tremendous sweep of ideas and sources and to cogently streamline into a tight and, most importantly, readable essay.
    — Test engineer, Naval Air Systems Command
  • One of the most insightful analysts on issues of defense economics...
    — Senior defense industry equities analyst
  • I need a Jim.
    — DC think tank director
  • Simply outstanding.
    — Deputy Under Secretary at the Pentagon, on recent analyses of future force structure requirements
  • You and Aboulafia are the only two publicly-quoted defense consultants worth paying attention to.
    — Public policy advocate
  • You’re one of the few guys who brings me real numbers. Most people just try to blow smoke...
    — President of a major military trucks and armored vehicles manufacturer
  • You are an impressive madman whom I am glad to know.
    — Vice President and M&A practice leader with an aerospace & defense consultancy
  • One of the best strategic moves we could have made, short of starting another war.
    — General Manager, leading weapons manufacturer, regarding recommendations for using the lessons of the campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq to plan the future of the company’s product lines
  • Exactly what we needed.
    — CEO of a defense buy-out firm, on market insights and financial projections regarding an acquisition target
  • Your ability to infer from open sources is wonderful.
    — Vice President for Corporate Strategy, leading armored vehicles manufacturer, on recent studies of fatality patterns in military vehicles in Afghanistan and Iraq
  • We should have done [this] a year ago, but I could never find someone like you with the right perspective.
    — Vice President for Business Development at a fast-growing manufacturing firm, on recommendations for managing the company’s problematic alliance with a Fortune 500 defense contractor