I am a political economist studying innovation, industry, and international security. Since September 2001, I have been advising industries and ministries on their issues of strategy, planning, and policy. My work aims to inform investors, industrialists, technologists, and policy-makers on how to effect, economically, a secure future.

Recent Articles

« A reply to Robert Scales' editorial in the Washington Post: don't overestimate the Syrians, and please remember the French | Main | Quo vadis, Air Force? »

10 September 2013

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Your article is well written. I had never better heard of some of these positive aspects of Canadian defence spending. I always thought we spend a lot and had very little in capability.

I lean towards a highly mobile force that can be put in place quickly by air and sea, as well, as a very small heavy force with a large reserve for a prolonged battle. I don't think we have either.

I'd like to equip the 4 divisions (as the government has recently renamed the areas), while providing full time manpower for only the current 1 division equivalent and reserve forces for the remaining . We seem to have a problem procuring anything in a timely manner. With that said, I bet in an emergency, we could recruit/train personnel faster than equipment.

Just read that the Rideau Institute is planning on releasing a "study" on the CCV titled "Stuck in a Rut: Harper government overrides Canadian Army, insists on buying outdated equipment". Those familiar with Canadian defense affairs should know all about the Rideau Institute, in fact its been mentioned recently on this site regarding their report on the Victoria class SSK. James I would be interested in hearing your opinion on the study should you read it given your upcoming report, and support for the CCV.

Thanks, KD. I have indeed now read that report from the Rideau Institute and the Centre for Policy Alternatives. I have strong objections to the argument, and I'm considering publishing a rebuttal sometime. But before I invest time in that, I may wait for the Treasury Board to make its decision.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Accolades

  • Read only the first few pages. The clarity and eloquence of them is highly unusual. Extremely un-boring. Everything that one does not need to know seems to have been removed before publication.
    — Attorney, politician, academic, and strategist
  • I'm continually amazed and impressed with what appears to me to be some magical ability you have to synthesize a tremendous sweep of ideas and sources and to cogently streamline into a tight and, most importantly, readable essay.
    — Test engineer, Naval Air Systems Command
  • One of the most insightful analysts on issues of defense economics...
    — Senior defense industry equities analyst
  • I need a Jim.
    — DC think tank director
  • Simply outstanding.
    — Deputy Under Secretary at the Pentagon, on recent analyses of future force structure requirements
  • You and Aboulafia are the only two publicly-quoted defense consultants worth paying attention to.
    — Public policy advocate
  • You’re one of the few guys who brings me real numbers. Most people just try to blow smoke...
    — President of a major military trucks and armored vehicles manufacturer
  • You are an impressive madman whom I am glad to know.
    — Vice President and M&A practice leader with an aerospace & defense consultancy
  • One of the best strategic moves we could have made, short of starting another war.
    — General Manager, leading weapons manufacturer, regarding recommendations for using the lessons of the campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq to plan the future of the company’s product lines
  • Exactly what we needed.
    — CEO of a defense buy-out firm, on market insights and financial projections regarding an acquisition target
  • Your ability to infer from open sources is wonderful.
    — Vice President for Corporate Strategy, leading armored vehicles manufacturer, on recent studies of fatality patterns in military vehicles in Afghanistan and Iraq
  • We should have done [this] a year ago, but I could never find someone like you with the right perspective.
    — Vice President for Business Development at a fast-growing manufacturing firm, on recommendations for managing the company’s problematic alliance with a Fortune 500 defense contractor