My Photo
James Hasik is a political economist studying innovation, industry, and international security. He serves as a senior research fellow in the School of Business at George Mason University, and a non-resident senior fellow in the Defense Technology program at the Center for European Policy Analysis. Since September 2001, he has been studying global security challenges and the economic enterprises that provide the tools to address them.

« Why the Close Combat Vehicle is not the right place to cut the Canadian military budget | Main | Does the South Korean fighter non-decision have more to do with North Korea or Japan? »

19 September 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The only reason the Commandant signed up for just one war is because he's an aviator. If he was a grunt like the Commandant is supposed to be, he definitely would have signed up for at least 2, with an option on a third ...

Could you do a net present value comparison on the cost of the F-35 vs the aircraft it is replacing? If the F-35 is to replace the F-16C/D, A-10C, AV-8B, and F/A-18C/D, what did it cost in current dollars to develop all those aircraft to their modern standards in comparison to the R&D costs spent on all F-35 models to the present?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)