« SRA sells ERA to OMNIPOL | Main | Some observations about past programmatic disasters, and a New Year's business resolution for 2012 »

20 December 2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bravo, Jim. Here's to some .45 cal therapy to the driving DoD fallacy of the primary importance of technological superiority.

The JSF should be cancelled for the reason alone, that LockMart considers a joke of a person such as Thomson worthy of hiring. Seriously, the garbage produced by that character is mindstaggering in itself, but to imagine that this actually earns him money from companies like that.

Just stumbled across your site--loved your common sense articles. Surprised you haven't posted comments on the recent enthusiasm for "acquisition reform" dujour.


Thanks for the note. I've written a few things here and there on the latest acquisition reform ideas, but my singular contribution so far is still awaiting publication. I've submitted to Defense Acquisition Review Journal an economic analysis of the renewed enthusiasm for buying technical data rights and packages. It has come back for reformatting (always a fun step), so I need to take care of that, and get it back to them. I can get you a copy of that.

Jim  +1-512-299-1269  www.jameshasik.com

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

My Photo

Find me

Facebook LinkedIn Skype Twitter Typepad

Accolades

  • One of the most insightful analysts on issues of defense economics...
    — Senior defense industry equities analyst
  • I need a Jim.
    — DC think tank director
  • Simply outstanding.
    — Deputy Under Secretary at the Pentagon, on recent analyses of future force structure requirements
  • You and Aboulafia are the only two publicly-quoted defense consultants worth paying attention to.
    — Someone who gets quoted a lot more than I do
  • You’re one of the few guys who brings me real numbers. Most people just try to blow smoke...
    — President of a major military trucks and armored vehicles manufacturer
  • You are an impressive madman whom I am glad to know.
    — Vice President and M&A practice leader with an aerospace & defense consultancy
  • One of the best strategic moves we could have made, short of starting another war.
    — General Manager, leading weapons manufacturer, regarding recommendations for using the lessons of the campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq to plan the future of the company’s product lines
  • Exactly what we needed.
    — CEO of a defense buy-out firm, on market insights and financial projections regarding an acquisition target
  • Your ability to infer from open sources is wonderful.
    — Vice President for Corporate Strategy, leading armored vehicles manufacturer, on recent studies of fatality patterns in military vehicles in Afghanistan and Iraq
  • We should have done [this] a year ago, but I could never find someone like you with the right perspective.
    — Vice President for Business Development at a fast-growing manufacturing firm, on recommendations for managing the company’s problematic alliance with a Fortune 500 defense contractor
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported

What I Do

  • Since September 2001, I have been researching and writing about global security challenges, and advising the economic enterprises that provide the tools to address them. Specifically, I help defense contractors and defense ministries with their problems in marketing, planning, and policy analysis.

Peer-Reviewed Articles

In the Press