« Consolidation begins—on General Dynamics' Proposed Purchase of Force Protection | Main | SRA sells ERA to OMNIPOL »

29 November 2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

TRAP is a mission the ACE trains for all the time. Bread and butter. Other recovery options involving SOF are another way to go, mission dependent. Navy helos are now in the game with their armed H-60s. I think it is the case that the USAF doesn't want to not be able to do this on their own, for aircrew warm & fuzzy. And Vietnam stats are hauled out. And so speaking of CAIV...

It's the "now" in "With cost as an independent variable...we must now seek the synergies and possibilities of capabilities that are integrated and combined in innovative ways" that is curious. All of these buzzwords have swirled around the acq system for decades now, as you note. We have certainly been seeking synergies, etc all along. Rather more seeking than capitalizing, in fact. I smell more of the same. Inauspicious boilerplate out of the new CJCS...

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Find me

LinkedIn Other... Skype Twitter Typepad

More at The Defense Industrialist

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported

What I Do

  • James Hasik is a senior fellow at the Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security at the Atlantic Council, and an associate professor of the practice of industrial studies at the Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy, a college of the National Defense University in Washington DC. Since September 2001, he has been studying global security challenges and the economic enterprises that provide the tools to address them. His opinions are not necessarily those of the NDU, the Defense Department, or the US federal government at all.

Articles

In the Press